<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benchmark LM Cracking &#8211; CPU vs. GPU &#8211; John the Ripper vs. Cain vs. Elcomsoft Distributed Password Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zettalife.com/2008/11/22/benchmark-lm-cracking-cpu-vs-gpu-john-the-ripper-vs-cain-vs-elcomsoft-distributed-password-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zettalife.com/2008/11/22/benchmark-lm-cracking-cpu-vs-gpu-john-the-ripper-vs-cain-vs-elcomsoft-distributed-password-recovery/</link>
	<description>Zetta = 10^21</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skan</title>
		<link>http://www.zettalife.com/2008/11/22/benchmark-lm-cracking-cpu-vs-gpu-john-the-ripper-vs-cain-vs-elcomsoft-distributed-password-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>skan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zettalife.com/?p=43#comment-177</guid>
		<description>OK, that&#039;s true, but the issue here is to show how efficient are applications that use the GPU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that&#8217;s true, but the issue here is to show how efficient are applications that use the GPU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superboard</title>
		<link>http://www.zettalife.com/2008/11/22/benchmark-lm-cracking-cpu-vs-gpu-john-the-ripper-vs-cain-vs-elcomsoft-distributed-password-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Superboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zettalife.com/?p=43#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Hi! This is my firs post BACK in english (I’m Chinese and not that good neither in writing english or oral english).
I wanna declare that You method of Beach Marketing is unfair.
1. John `s Best platform is NIX, with 64bit cpu (make it as linux-x86-64 or so). your version is window, in this case it slows down the speed. The actual DES Crack speed for john in your CPU should be about  2000K C/S. it was 1500K IN my LINUX@T7100; And 2510K c/s real, 2530K c/s virtual in my OSX10.5@XEON5500(2.66GHZ).
2. John only consume one CPU so you can crack two different password with you 2 cores. But you can do that with EDPR.
3.  I through to test LM-hash is none of sence because of Rainbow tables may be the best way to crack it.
It `s just my opinion, if you don`t agree pls tell me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! This is my firs post BACK in english (I’m Chinese and not that good neither in writing english or oral english).<br />
I wanna declare that You method of Beach Marketing is unfair.<br />
1. John `s Best platform is NIX, with 64bit cpu (make it as linux-x86-64 or so). your version is window, in this case it slows down the speed. The actual DES Crack speed for john in your CPU should be about  2000K C/S. it was 1500K IN my LINUX@T7100; And 2510K c/s real, 2530K c/s virtual in my OSX10.5@XEON5500(2.66GHZ).<br />
2. John only consume one CPU so you can crack two different password with you 2 cores. But you can do that with EDPR.<br />
3.  I through to test LM-hash is none of sence because of Rainbow tables may be the best way to crack it.<br />
It `s just my opinion, if you don`t agree pls tell me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tronador</title>
		<link>http://www.zettalife.com/2008/11/22/benchmark-lm-cracking-cpu-vs-gpu-john-the-ripper-vs-cain-vs-elcomsoft-distributed-password-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Tronador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zettalife.com/?p=43#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Sorprende bastante los resultados 22.5 M/s con una tarjeta gama media (q ademas tiene gpu &quot;recortada&quot; para portatil)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorprende bastante los resultados 22.5 M/s con una tarjeta gama media (q ademas tiene gpu &#8220;recortada&#8221; para portatil)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
